What is the fastest (possibly unsafe) way to read a byte[]?
Posted
by
Aidiakapi
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Aidiakapi
Published on 2011-03-04T15:12:32Z
Indexed on
2011/03/04
15:24 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 204
I'm working on a server project in C#, and after a TCP message is received, it is parsed, and stored in a byte[] of exact size. (Not a buffer of fixed length, but a byte[] of an absolute length in which all data is stored.)
Now for reading this byte[] I'll be creating some wrapper functions (also for compatibility), these are the signatures of all functions I need:
public byte ReadByte();
public sbyte ReadSByte();
public short ReadShort();
public ushort ReadUShort();
public int ReadInt();
public uint ReadUInt();
public float ReadFloat();
public double ReadDouble();
public string ReadChars(int length);
public string ReadString();
The string is a \0 terminated string, and is probably encoded in ASCII or UTF-8, but I cannot tell that for sure, since I'm not writing the client.
The data exists of:
byte[] _data;
int _offset;
Now I can write all those functions manually, like this:
public byte ReadByte()
{
return _data[_offset++];
}
public sbyte ReadSByte()
{
byte r = _data[_offset++];
if (r >= 128) return (sbyte)(r - 256);
else return (sbyte)r;
}
public short ReadShort()
{
byte b1 = _data[_offset++];
byte b2 = _data[_offset++];
if (b1 >= 128) return (short)(b1 * 256 + b2 - 65536);
else return (short)(b1 * 256 + b2);
}
public short ReadUShort()
{
byte b1 = _data[_offset++];
return (short)(b1 * 256 + _data[_offset++]);
}
But I wonder if there's a faster way, not excluding the use of unsafe code, since this seems a little bit too much work for simple processing.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner